翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hadley Lodge ・ Hadley Mountain ・ Hadley Mountain Fire Observation Station ・ Hadley Parabolic Bridge ・ Hadley Peak ・ Hadley Point ・ Hadley railway station ・ Hadley Richardson ・ Hadley Rille Books ・ Hadley Rille meteorite ・ Hadley School for the Blind ・ Hadley Township ・ Hadley Township, Michigan ・ Hadley Township, Pike County, Illinois ・ Hadley Upland ・ Hadley v Baxendale ・ Hadley Wickham ・ Hadley Wood ・ Hadley Wood Golf Course ・ Hadley Wood railway station ・ Hadley! ・ Hadley's Purchase, New Hampshire ・ Hadley's Rebellion ・ Hadley, California ・ Hadley, Indiana ・ Hadley, Kentucky ・ Hadley, Massachusetts ・ Hadley, Minnesota ・ Hadley, Nevada ・ Hadley, New York Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hadley v Baxendale ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hadley v Baxendale ''Hadley v Baxendale'' () (EWHC J70 ) is a leading English contract law case. It sets the basic rule to determine consequential damages from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have foreseen. ==Facts== The claimants, Mr Hadley and another, were millers and mealmen and worked together in a partnership as proprietors of the City Steam-Mills in Gloucester. They cleaned grain, ground it into meal and dressed it into flour, sharps, and bran. A crankshaft of a steam engine at the mill had broken and Hadley arranged to have a new one made by W. Joyce & Co. in Greenwich. Before the new crankshaft could be made, W. Joyce & Co. required that the broken crankshaft be sent to them in order to ensure that the new crankshaft would fit together properly with the other parts of the steam engine. Hadley contracted with defendants Baxendale and Ors, who were operating together as common carriers under the name Pickford & Co., to deliver the crankshaft to engineers for repair by a certain date at a cost of £2 sterling and 4 shillings (current value of about £240.00)(). Baxendale failed to deliver on the date in question, causing Hadley to lose business. Hadley sued for the profits he lost due to Baxendale's late delivery, and the jury awarded Hadley damages of £25 (present value about £2500). Baxendale appealed, contending that he did not know that Hadley would suffer any particular damage by reason of the late delivery. The question raised by the appeal in this case was whether a defendant in a breach of contract case could be held liable for damages that the defendant was not aware would be incurred from a breach of the contract. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hadley v Baxendale」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.